Friday, May 3, 2013

What's Better And Worse in the News?

What's worse?  Obama's performance in Mexico was so immature it was pathetic. He talked about his gun bill that would stop Mexico from getting gun in the wrong hands. What hypocrisy! Didn't he just illegally walk hundreds of guns across the border without the knowledge of the Mexican government? Don't the Mexican armories lose 25 per cent of their weapons, over 9,000 rifles? Aren't we talking about international drug cartels with almost unlimited money with submarines and probably anything else they want short of nuclear weapons? For Obama to say that American gun policies have an effect on the international drug cartels operating in Mexico is just ludicrous. Do the students he addressed have hot peppers for brains? Are they that ill-informed and unthinking? \
  Can you believe that he actually said there are segments in America that don't recognize the sovereignty of Mexico? That must have been his projection for he and Eric Holder are the ones that had American guns walked illegally into Mexico with getting the permission of the Mexican goverment. Besides, it is the Mexican government that does not respect our sovereignty because they encourage and aid Mexicans into crossing illegally into the United States. Then many of these illegal immigrants get on various American welfare assistance programs which are funded by Americans not the Mexican government. What an assinine display Obama made in Mexico.
What's Better?
Bryant York, Republican strategist has just written that even if 70 per cent of the Hispanics had voted for John McCain, it would not have been enough to get him elected. This is good news in that depending on the Hispanic vote for Republican elections is mostly futile despite what Marco Rubio thinks. Perhaps if we can get Hispanics to read and rave about "Atlas Shrugged" that will change.

No comments: