School Shootings #6

     I called New Hampshire Governor John Sunnunu's office today, and his aide had not heard any talk about putting metal detectors and gunpowder sniffing dogs at schools. To my asking, she replied that he was pro- Second Amendment. I asked the aide if she would find out why he's not demanding detectors and dogs.
     I started to call the Vermont state representatives, but they did not have offices except for one Senator, and he had a robot.
     I read in the Wall Street Journal today that the Texas governor has apparently never heard of metal detectors and dogs or has ruled them out because his new plans for schools don't include them. Instead he wants to come down harder on the citizen: He wants to require secure safety lockers for guns in your homes. fine you more if you don't have them, and require that the age of your kids be lengthened during which you as their parents are liable for their gun violence. You'd voted him into office? I plan to call and try to find out why he didn't push for detectors and dogs. I urge you to call as many legislators as you can and ask why no detectors and dogs. Be as forceful as you can. Make an impression. Blow their doors off. Remember, it could be your child, grandchild, niece, nephew next. Do it for the children! And when there's another school shooting, and you see the politicians and the security people wringing their hands and crying, spit on your screen. Nick

School Shootings #4

Both the spokesmen for Bernie Sanders and Vermont Congressman Peter Welch seemed to rebut my premise that if you are against metal detectors and gunpowder dogs, you are for the massacre of schoolchildren as a pretext for taking the individual's guns. I didn't challenge that, but I will with future assertions. I'm admittedly a literalist, but what else would be the reason for not having detectors and dogs that makes sense? I know about the crazies, the psychopaths, the ACLU, and, of course, the Russians. The world isn't perfect and isn't going to be.
     I see that South Carolina Representative Wendell Gilliard has long been a supporter of metal detectors in schools and that Boston Chief of Police for Public Schools, Eric Weston, praises metal detectors for keeping guns entirely out of schools and reducing the number of knives. He recommends metal detectors. I'd like to ask these gentlemen if they have been attacked for their praise of metal detectors and why. If they have been attacked, I'd like to ask if they suspected the motivation of the attackers was that the attackers didn't seem to want a solution to school shootings. I'd like to know if any attackers either blatantly said or implied that finding a solution to school shootings through metal detectors and gunpowder dogs obscured "the larger problem" of individual gun ownership. Finding anyone sick or stupid enough to say that would be the motherlode to my thesis that collectivists don't care about individuals, indeed would happily murder them for structure that strengthens central command. In this case, the structure would be a law banning gun ownership by the individual.
Only central command could own guns. Which means the Obama/Clinton Progressive Party which has already infiltrated the top echelons of the FBI, CIA, and NSA. I guess I have to go now and catch my missile. Nick

School Shootings #3

     Today, I tried to call President Trump but had to settle for comments to him. I asked this question" "Does President Trump not demanding metal detectors and gunpowder-sniffing dogs at schools because he wants more schoolchildren shot so guns will be banned?
     The lady took the question and promised to get it to him. I asked that he call me. She laughed. I then tried to call the governor of Vermont, but my number didn't work. Instead, I got the governor of Alabama's office, and asked the same question. I was shuttled about twice and then had to leave a message with law enforcement. Next, I called Senator Bernie Sanders office. I asked the question, and things got a little tense for some reason. He's not for allowing kids to be shot at school, but I heard no support of metal detectors or gunpowder dogs. If someone didn't want kids to be shot why wouldn't they support metal detectors and gunpowder dogs? Why can't we assume that if they don't support metal detectors and gunpowder dogs at school then they do want schoolchildren shot.
You can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't say you want to leave your schoolchildren without entrance security and say you don't want them shot. Your actions speak louder than your words. I told the rather hostile speaker that I wanted to get ahead of the school shooters by metal detectors and gunpowder dogs already at the school waiting for them. I told her you could secure metal detectors immediately but it would be a long wait before there were no more guns in America. ( Like never. Just look at the farcical "War On Drugs." Or go back a bit more and look at the farcical "Prohibition" of alcohol. Both failed because they were undemocratic. People want drugs and alcohol and any sane person wants a gun too.) Swords drawn, the Bernie speaker and I said goodbye.
     Maybe Bernie will eventually get back with me about what his position on civil forfeiture is. I asked his representative that question last August at the nice luncheon he threw in Brattleboro, Vermont.
     I then called Congressman Peter Welch and asked the metal detector and dogs question. The speaker was not at all transparent; he only said that more funds for school security were being asked but wouldn't say what for.
     At Senator Leahy's office, I had to leave a message to please call me back.
     So that's how it goes. Not very impressive. I don't see the love for schoolchildren, only blather.  Nick

School Shootings #2

     A quick google search showed that there are schools using metal detectors and gunpowder-detecting dogs. I trust if they're doing that, they are guarding all the entrances. I also see that the ACLU is acting against the safety of children, educators, and law enforcement by opposing these measures. So why is there only talk about guns restrictions on all the TV stations I've seen except for Fox. I think it is because the freedom haters see the slaughter to schoolchildren as the vehicle to ride to confiscate Americans' guns. Thus, they and the ACLU will hush or oppose metal detectors and gunpowder dogs at controlled entrances to schools because they want children to be killed to further their malicious campaign to take the individual's gun ownership away.
     Parents who support having their children live should call their school board members and superintendent and promise them they will do their best to have the parents' of any shot students in the future sue them both as school employees and personally. Because of moral relativism, you can't appeal to the consciences of these less-than-animals. They only care about their money and prestige. Sue them and take both away!

School Shootings

     I get the feeling that students are protesting the possession of firearms not because this is the immediate solution to school shootings but because they are the useful idiots of their leftists teachers who are not interested in their students' safety or their own, but in the elimination of firearms ownership by free individuals. I say this with the qualifications that I do not have television or access to the internet except at the public library. I could easily be missing something [ yes, I know, leftists: I'm missing a brain.] What makes me say that is the immediate solution is not the confiscation of firearms, but stopping would-be shooters from entering schools. You can't eliminate evil, but you can block it. That can be done by having a single point of entry into a school plus metal detectors for firearms made of metal plus gunpowder sniffing dogs at the single point of entry for firearms made of non-metallic parts.
     I say this is no guarantee that no firearms would get into schools but it the metal detectors and gunpowder sniffing dogs should eliminate most firearms. Plus, it would serve as a real deterrent. These kids doing the shooting are not Navy Seals. They are fragile, troubled snowflakes who need boundaries and cognitive-behavioral therapy. If they know they will have to stand in line for metal detectors and gunpowder sniffing dogs, most will crack at the thought and not bring a gun. Those who do will try to brave the waiting in line, the detectors, the dogs will show signs of stress. If our police and school personnel will become as smart and sophisticated as the Israelis, they will put down their doughnuts and Red Books and look for tells of stress. Then they will politely and respectfully engage the student and do a body and belongings search.
     Maybe students are already asking for these precautions. If you are, then I apologize for taking you to task. Your idea of eliminating guns is quixotic and wrong. Look how well the prohibition on drugs starting in 1914 has worked. Has it eliminated drugs? No! All it's done is to give trillions of dollars to the drug cartels, law enforcement, and lawyers, created more lethal types of drugs, and put millions of mainly blacks and Hispanics into jail, thus ruining their employment opportunities for life. Look at well the prohibition on alcohol worked. It was ignored until it was lifted. This is a democracy. People want alcohol, drugs, and guns. The vast majority of people use alcohol, drugs, and guns without getting into trouble. The shallow, macho people want to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Being mean makes them manly and strong, they think. Don't fall for the shallow end of the genetic pool, students. Be truly strong and macho. Think, read, watch, discuss, and experience. Get out of man-made pseudo-reality and go into nature and observe how reality works!