Obama So Vulnerable !

  Obama and the liberal media have made much of Romney's words about the other 47% as a primier example of Romney's lack of compassion. Now is the time to hit Obama back with the charge that his own lack of compassion was displayed on the floor of the Illlinois Senate in 2001, I believe, when he was the only Senator malevolent enough to speak against the Born-Alive Bill. What was happening was that children, American citizens I remind you, were being born alive after abortion attempts had failed to kill them. The procedure at various hospitals in Illinois was to ignore the babies until they died of thirst, hunger, hypothermia, whatever. Sometimes, they were placed in broom closets to die. Again, these are American citizens, people. As a child protective services worker and supervisor for nine years, I would like to know if public social services were contacted and if so, what was their response. I would like to know if any of these doctors, nurses, and other hospital workers had the compassion and guts to call the police. The calls could have been made anonymously even, and still it looks like no one had the conscience and courage to make the call. What was wrong with these people? And we slight the German people for baving allowed the extermination of about seven million people? When American medical doctors, the best of the best, allow the murder of infants to go unreported?These were no fetuses; these were born babies, American citizens. Several Born Alive Bills were introduced to make sure these babies were not neglected after they were born. Obama oppossed all of them. I have read the minutes of the Illilnois State Senate, and Obama spoke against one of the bills as getting  in the way of a mother's right to abortion.He even cowardly called the babies "unviable fetuses." Here they are, born babies, and this jackass is calling them "unviable fetuses." He was called on this lie, albeit oh so gently, by the patron of the bill, Peterson, I think he was. You know what Obama was doing. He was pursuing the pro-choice vote. He was going to guarantee that if a woman wanted to kill her fetus, it would be done. Even if doctors and nurses had to kill by neglect a born child to do it. I support pro-choice because I believe a woman has the right to her body. No government has the right to force someone to carry a child as long as the child is dependent on her. When the unborn child can live without his mother's assistance, and the mother no longer wants him, he should be delivered and put up for adoption. But I will bet you that these same women who can shout they have a right to their own bodies when it comes to abortion are perfectly content to have Mayor Bloomberg and whatever petty tyrants, freedom haters all, pop up to tell you what and how much you can eat. These women will allow the tyrants to use force and violence to enforce their laws too. Force or violence is a narcotic. The tyrants will need more force or violence exerted on you to get the same effect. You know how an addiction progresses. It works you, calling for more and more to get the same effect. These force and violence addicts will have to make more and more laws forcing you to do or not do more and more things to get the same high. Eventually, they will get around to abortions and make you grovel and beg on your knees before them to be able to have one.Your freedom of choice will be over.  I have gone aside for a moment to demonstrate to you that I am not an anti-abortionist trying to villify Obama. I am trying to show you that I am villifying murder. If Romney doesn't have the Moxie to point out Obama's complete lack of compassion for brand-new babies, I urge that some PAC do it on national TV.The Navy Seals certainly have all the courage required. Two-Guns.