Medicare Promotes Homosexuality !

    Medicare promotes homosexuality by not covering drugs for men whose penises do not get stiff enough for vaginal penetration. This is no small number of American men as stiffness can be diminished by antidepressants, blood control pills, and heavy drinking. I am sure I have missed many other contributors. Say you go to your doctor for this problem, and he prescribes 50 mg. Cialis, and you take your prescription to Walmart. You will find out that each pill costs $55. Men being men, you will probably immediately think, "Damn, if I didn't buy four pills, I could have sex with a gorgeous hooker!" Then, you may, if you are a Walmart regular, realize you don't have $55 just to spend getting yourself primed for sex. Who wants to get intimate with a woman if you can't do anything? How can you get intimate unless you want to be Bill Clinton forever, and what woman would tolerate that anyway? Who is going to want you now that you are passive, a receptor instead of a penetrator? Guess who- homosexuals! You'll fit right in -rather, they will fit right in.
    Almost all men have problems with becoming homosexual. Some have heart attacks just thinking about it. But men adapt. Think prisons. If men cannot have sex with women, a sizeable number are going to adapt to sex with men. Then think of the consequences of that. As man are promiscous be an evolutionary dictate, unless a woman makes them walk the line, the spread of HIV, and other STDs is going to dramatically increase. The damage done in putting penises and semen into the posterior orifice can be significant. All these diseases and physical damages are going to cost Medicare sooner or later in all Americans lives. I say it will cost even more than the total cost of Cialis if Cialis were doled out by Medicaid at say three a month. Do we really want to spend more money in Medicare while Medicare drives men to homosexuality? The rules need to change! Allow reimbursement of penis stiffeners now before you women lose your men to homosexuals and you children lose your fathers because they've betrayed your mother. Such a win-win situation will never be accepted willingly by the federal employees. It's just not their nature. You're going to have to trump them by raising hell.
    Peter Nickerson, Philosophy Major, Class of '68 (see the self-interest?) W&M