Bigfoot Takes Rifle and Deer.

    Bigfoot takes rifle and half a deer. This happened near Wallace, Idaho, on October 5, 1949. A 22 year-old hunter kills a deer, takes half out on a backboard to his truck, and starts to go back, fires a shot, and then he's gone. Searchers find his body with his rifle missing. The other half of the deer back in the woods has also vanished. The coroner comes out as the body is dragged to the road and says the hunter died of a heart attack. Case closed.
    No autopsy. No attention to the missing rifle. Why would a 22 year-older have a heart attack? He was carrying out a deer not a moose! He was returning to the other half of the deer when he had the heart attack. What was the meaning of the expended cartridge? Did he wound or kill something on the way back to his deer? Was there blood, a piece of fur, or tracks to identify this third party to the deer and hunter scenario? Whom do we know comes into hunters' dead deer and takes them from time to time? Why was no autopsy done? Everything is ignored and smoothed over, but so many questions remain that only an idiot would accept the simple explanation of "It was a heart attack." The saving grace is that this happened in 1949. After World War II, people were much more passive about the lines they were being given by government employees. After serving in the Armed Forces during the war, most had become accustomed to keeping their mouths shut and just doing it- whatever it was. Few people serve in the military now, but the challenge of being duped by authority remains.

Reference: From the book, "Missing 411- North America And Beyond" (2012) by David Paulides, pages 99-100. Ex-cop David Paulides has written two books about Bigfoot and followed those up with four books that he will not admit are about Bigfoot too. He claims he hasn't come to a conclusion. Nor does he offer even an hypothesis. He is being very coy.  These books are the Missing 411 triad and his latest book, "The Devil's In The Details." The book "Missing 411 - North America And Beyond" has much disgraceful sentence structure and spelling in it. David, men are not "coeds."
There is a section devoted to the disappearances of coeds, and you see pictures and write ups of male students. This comes from someone who has not only a college degree but a graduate degree? David writes that a number of people read his book before it is published to give him their comments. What's their problem? When so much of the book is illiterate, and it comes from someone with two university degrees supposedly and is reviewed by other people, again supposedly,  I have to wonder how trustworthy the book is. Spellbinding? You bet. True and complete? I don't know. Cops have a lot of chutzpah.

"Your Daily Bigfoot: Sensational Titles Backed With Facts" by Peter Nickerson, 352-359-0850

For a once-a-month presentation of the worldwide Wild Man (and Woman) through videos, pictures, sounds, and print, go to "www.watchingbigfoot.com"