One of the major contradictions in the Koran is the 114 verses that speak of love, peace, and forgiveness. These verses were "heard" by Muhammad in Medina where he had to tread lightly and look nice as there was much opposition to his new religion, which included destroying the statues of other people's gods in public places. It appears that intolerance and respect for other people's property were lacking in Islam from the beginning.
However, when Muhammad moved to Mecca, he was in a very powerful position having driven out two Jewish tribes and having killed the men of another Jewish tribe,and taken their women, children, and property. Now he didn't have to tread lightly. Now he had "revealed" to him Sura 9:5 ( the Koran is not in chronological order) which said, "Fight and slay the pagans wherever you find them, beleaguer them, lie in wait for them in every strategy (of war)..." This verse is known as the Verse of the Sword, and it abrogates the 114 verses of love, peace, and forgiveness.
Islamic scholars have attempted to overcome these contradictions by deciding that the more recent verses override (nasikh) the earlier ones. Of course, any thinking person would have to ask why, if Allah was all-knowing and all-powerful, would he contradict himself? Muhammad headed that question off at the pass by "hearing" Angel Gabriel say that Allah said that any Muslim who questioned anything about Islam should be killed. That's called ad baculum logic - logic of the stick. It's the logic of avoiding bodily harm which brings us back to the lynch pin of radical Islam: force. Why did Muhammad have such an extreme love of force? What happened to him?
Peter Nickerson, Philosophy Major
"The measure of a man'
Is not what he says,
But what he does,
And what he allows others,
To do in his presence."
-US Navy Seal Instructor
Thursday, October 27, 2016
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
Crusaders? Defenders, Crybullies!
If radical Islamists don't get what they want through demanding, pushing, intimidating, and attacking then they falsely play the victim role. They have no pride in acting like men. Instead, they are robots programmed by the myth that Allah spoke to the angel Gabriel who spoke to Muhammad. Among the Koran, the Hadith, and the Sharia every move, every thought, a radical Muslim makes is mandated from the past.
The following comes from Glenn Beck's book It Is About Islam, page 107 so you can verify, and I hope read on. The Crusades were a response to
Islamic imperialism. The key to understanding radical Islam is the word "force."
Everything is done by force because everything is so horrible, no one would do any of it by free choice. Eventually, force brainwashes the convert, and she comes to love the force. If you or someone else can't defeat the aggressor, most people eventually identify with it, no matter how evil it is.
The Christian crusades were bracketed before and after by Islamic jihad which means Holy War. Some historians have said that without the Christian Crusades, all of Europe would have gone to the Muslim sword. In 1683, the Muslims from the Ottoman Empire were held back from seizing Vienna.
It is disgusting that Hellary Clinton can turn her back on all that is happening right now with radical Muslim barbarity and imperialism and call those people who don't want others to be murdered "Islamophobes." Her behavior is divorced from reality. She should be elected president of the Lunatics Club, not president of the United States. Hillary is above the law. There's no controlling her. At least America can control Trump. We've made him apologize at least once during the campaign. Madam Secretary will not and cannot come to heel. If she and Obama gave us the creation of the Islamic State, what catastrophes will be next if she becomes President?
Peter Nickerson, Philosophy Major
"The measure of a man
Is not what he says,
But what he does,
And what he allows others.
To do in his presence."
-US Navy Seal Instructor
The following comes from Glenn Beck's book It Is About Islam, page 107 so you can verify, and I hope read on. The Crusades were a response to
Islamic imperialism. The key to understanding radical Islam is the word "force."
Everything is done by force because everything is so horrible, no one would do any of it by free choice. Eventually, force brainwashes the convert, and she comes to love the force. If you or someone else can't defeat the aggressor, most people eventually identify with it, no matter how evil it is.
The Christian crusades were bracketed before and after by Islamic jihad which means Holy War. Some historians have said that without the Christian Crusades, all of Europe would have gone to the Muslim sword. In 1683, the Muslims from the Ottoman Empire were held back from seizing Vienna.
It is disgusting that Hellary Clinton can turn her back on all that is happening right now with radical Muslim barbarity and imperialism and call those people who don't want others to be murdered "Islamophobes." Her behavior is divorced from reality. She should be elected president of the Lunatics Club, not president of the United States. Hillary is above the law. There's no controlling her. At least America can control Trump. We've made him apologize at least once during the campaign. Madam Secretary will not and cannot come to heel. If she and Obama gave us the creation of the Islamic State, what catastrophes will be next if she becomes President?
Peter Nickerson, Philosophy Major
"The measure of a man
Is not what he says,
But what he does,
And what he allows others.
To do in his presence."
-US Navy Seal Instructor
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
How To Defeat Sharia Law MuslimTerrorists
Voltaire is said to have asked God to make his enemies ridiculous, and God did. In the absence of God, I propose we mortals recognize the ridiculousness off Sharia Law and laugh it out of existence.
Here's the how and the why: The power in Islam is strictly vertical in that power goes from dictator to a smaller dictator on down. The top dictator is Muhammad who claimed that what he was saying and doing was from the lips of God delivered by Archangel Gabriel over the course of twenty-some years. Therefore, one had to do what Muhammad said as it was the word of God, and death was the penalty of disobedience. The smaller dictators beneath Muhammad were the autocratic rulers and caliphs who claimed authority to interpret what Muhammad said and the authority to execute what they claimed Muhammad said on pain of death to any dissenters. At the end of this absolute power hierarchy was, and still is, the married male. Feminists will love the following, but I remind them that I am now doing the job they have been too cowardly to take up. Again, it is a white male making a difference. It is the Sharia Law Muslim married male who is the final despot in this chain of absolute power. He can beat and kill family members as he wishes. He can have his daughters' genitals cut off and then sewn over so that penetration is extremely painful. The hole left for pee is so little that the woman can only dribble when she pees. The dribble is a widely known sound of sexual mutilation in women. He can divorce any of his up to four wives simply by saying, "I divorce you" three times. He can cast out any of his wives, refuse to divorce her for the rest of her life, and she cannot get a divorce, or date, or remarry. He can kill a daughter who has been raped or has had sex without marriage. The married male decides whom his daughters marry, and daughters have to submit to a hymen check by the bridegroom's family if the parents insist on inspecting the goods. The married male decides if and when his wives can leave the home. He can insist on sex at any time from his wives. In his home, the married male Sharia Law Muslim is an absolutely savage god and dictator if it pleasures him. He may earn his living shoveling donkey dung, but he can go at home at night like a King and demand and get unlimited control over his wives and children. He is a god and a dictator in his home, in his harem.
The Sharia Law Muslims have learned to use terror well on their converts. Their system of power is starkly vertical, with only a few having power unlike
Western democracies in spite of the "progressives" who try to consolidate all power into administrative agencies that can't be legally challenged. It is also a closed system, like communism, in which there is no way out of it. If a woman leaves her tyrannical husband, she is fair game on the streets for touching, raping and even killing. If she is able to escape, the only place she can go is to a country that is kind and respects the civil rights of women and will take her in as a refugee. Mission about impossible. Short of killing the married men, there is no way, but one, to eliminate this system, especially when it is buttressed and furthered by Arabian oil money.The married men are not going to be talked out of being little gods and dictators. They're hooked on the control, the sex, the unaccountable freedom in their little harems. The only other way except for wiping out the men is ridicule.
The way they behave must be mocked and disrespected as behavior that is so evil and crazy, that it is absurd. Being manly and having honor are of supreme importance to Sharia Law Muslim men. We must point out that running women's lives is not the measure of a man. We must point out that cutting or rubbing off women's genitals, imprisoning them in their harems, depriving them of their civil rights as individuals and persons of their own is not the measure of a man, but of a weak, effeminate boy. Along with the power of our armed forces, we must and can laugh these women-enslaving parasites out of their ancient ideology and insist on behavior that is respectful of the rights of others. This is our next weapon. Men will let us use it. Boys, especially women-parasite boys, won't.
Peter Nickerson, Philosophy Major, peternickerson12@yahoo.com
"The measure of a man'
Is not what he says,
But what he does,
And what he allows others,
To do in his presence."
-Navy Seal Instructor
Here's the how and the why: The power in Islam is strictly vertical in that power goes from dictator to a smaller dictator on down. The top dictator is Muhammad who claimed that what he was saying and doing was from the lips of God delivered by Archangel Gabriel over the course of twenty-some years. Therefore, one had to do what Muhammad said as it was the word of God, and death was the penalty of disobedience. The smaller dictators beneath Muhammad were the autocratic rulers and caliphs who claimed authority to interpret what Muhammad said and the authority to execute what they claimed Muhammad said on pain of death to any dissenters. At the end of this absolute power hierarchy was, and still is, the married male. Feminists will love the following, but I remind them that I am now doing the job they have been too cowardly to take up. Again, it is a white male making a difference. It is the Sharia Law Muslim married male who is the final despot in this chain of absolute power. He can beat and kill family members as he wishes. He can have his daughters' genitals cut off and then sewn over so that penetration is extremely painful. The hole left for pee is so little that the woman can only dribble when she pees. The dribble is a widely known sound of sexual mutilation in women. He can divorce any of his up to four wives simply by saying, "I divorce you" three times. He can cast out any of his wives, refuse to divorce her for the rest of her life, and she cannot get a divorce, or date, or remarry. He can kill a daughter who has been raped or has had sex without marriage. The married male decides whom his daughters marry, and daughters have to submit to a hymen check by the bridegroom's family if the parents insist on inspecting the goods. The married male decides if and when his wives can leave the home. He can insist on sex at any time from his wives. In his home, the married male Sharia Law Muslim is an absolutely savage god and dictator if it pleasures him. He may earn his living shoveling donkey dung, but he can go at home at night like a King and demand and get unlimited control over his wives and children. He is a god and a dictator in his home, in his harem.
The Sharia Law Muslims have learned to use terror well on their converts. Their system of power is starkly vertical, with only a few having power unlike
Western democracies in spite of the "progressives" who try to consolidate all power into administrative agencies that can't be legally challenged. It is also a closed system, like communism, in which there is no way out of it. If a woman leaves her tyrannical husband, she is fair game on the streets for touching, raping and even killing. If she is able to escape, the only place she can go is to a country that is kind and respects the civil rights of women and will take her in as a refugee. Mission about impossible. Short of killing the married men, there is no way, but one, to eliminate this system, especially when it is buttressed and furthered by Arabian oil money.The married men are not going to be talked out of being little gods and dictators. They're hooked on the control, the sex, the unaccountable freedom in their little harems. The only other way except for wiping out the men is ridicule.
The way they behave must be mocked and disrespected as behavior that is so evil and crazy, that it is absurd. Being manly and having honor are of supreme importance to Sharia Law Muslim men. We must point out that running women's lives is not the measure of a man. We must point out that cutting or rubbing off women's genitals, imprisoning them in their harems, depriving them of their civil rights as individuals and persons of their own is not the measure of a man, but of a weak, effeminate boy. Along with the power of our armed forces, we must and can laugh these women-enslaving parasites out of their ancient ideology and insist on behavior that is respectful of the rights of others. This is our next weapon. Men will let us use it. Boys, especially women-parasite boys, won't.
Peter Nickerson, Philosophy Major, peternickerson12@yahoo.com
"The measure of a man'
Is not what he says,
But what he does,
And what he allows others,
To do in his presence."
-Navy Seal Instructor
Wednesday, September 14, 2016
How Palestinian Immigrants Destroyed Lebanon lV
Hussein's Black September expulsion of Palestinians from Jordan was a calamity for Lebanon. Lebanon was the only Arab countries of twenty-two to accept Palestinian refugees. That fact needs to be kept in mind as you read the duplicitous sweet talk about Arabs caring about anything beyond their person aggrandizement and the spread of Islam. These Arabic countries had vast spaces in which to put the Palestinian refugees. They had the whole Sinai which the Egyptians had not been able to develop due to the drag of their radical Islamic culture. In addition, Nasser and the other Arab heads of states wanted the Palestinians to be their proxy fighters against Israel. These refugees, plus the high rate of Arab reproduction - another factor the European countries need to keep in mind regarding their Arab immigrants- and the exodus of Christians, who could feel the increased hostility due to the increased number of Arabs and saw the future- all resulted in the Arabs achieving a numerical superiority in Lebanon.
In addition, the non-Muslims in Lebanon were aware of the terrorism of the PLO headed by Yassar Arafat, who was supported by the Soviet Union and other Muslim countries. The Arabs pushed a mandate to "Liberate Palestine" which meant to drive the Israelis into the sea onto the Palestinians. As they gradually became more blaming of Israel for everything wrong and converted to radical Islam, the Palestinians saw Lebanon as a base to wage war against Israel and have Israel make reprisals in Lebanon rather than the densely packed Palestine.
peternickerson12@yahoo.com- Philosophy Major, Class of '68, William and Mary
"The measure of a man,
Is not what he say,
But what he does,
And what he allows,
Others to do in his presence."
- Navy Seal Instructor
In addition, the non-Muslims in Lebanon were aware of the terrorism of the PLO headed by Yassar Arafat, who was supported by the Soviet Union and other Muslim countries. The Arabs pushed a mandate to "Liberate Palestine" which meant to drive the Israelis into the sea onto the Palestinians. As they gradually became more blaming of Israel for everything wrong and converted to radical Islam, the Palestinians saw Lebanon as a base to wage war against Israel and have Israel make reprisals in Lebanon rather than the densely packed Palestine.
peternickerson12@yahoo.com- Philosophy Major, Class of '68, William and Mary
"The measure of a man,
Is not what he say,
But what he does,
And what he allows,
Others to do in his presence."
- Navy Seal Instructor
Tuesday, September 13, 2016
Obama's "Benghazing" Venezuela Now
Obama abandoned the men and women including two Seals and an American Ambassador at an embassy extension and a CIA station in Benghazi.
Some say a subordinate ordered their rescue, but the order got lost in the shuffle. How come? Why did the President allow that to happen? Isn't that negligence of duty? Give me the money and I'll make the complaint in court.
What was he so busy doing- apologizing about America, the savior of this planet? Now he's doing a benghazi on Venezuela. The people - women, children, and men- are suffering from hunger and thirst due to - once again!- another failed socialist economy, and he is doing nothing. He may not be, but Americans are better than that. I call upon the people of America - We, the people, We, the government- to start pushing our lazy, morally challenged, federal employees to
get moving on aiding Venezuela. If our mostly worthless federal employees, excepting many such as those in the Armed Services, don't respond, I ask that we, the people, start without them. An excellent resource would be getting your pastors involved with collecting food and drink for the Venezuelans. The Venezuelans are so ignorant and brain-washed about economics, that they may hate us capitalists, but helping them survive their socialist economy, now on its last leg, is the right thing to do. I'd go to my Episcopal church but gave up on it a year ago when the high priest showed no interest in the Copts being killed in the Middle East. Hillary and socialism are two peas in the same pods, and people starving to death under socialism is a tragic part of that insane ideology, so I do not expect her to show any initiative as it would be calling attention to the failure of socialism. Let'em die, we're going to stick to our crazy ideology! What else can crazies do? But where is Trump on this?
Peter Nickerson, Philosophy Major
Some say a subordinate ordered their rescue, but the order got lost in the shuffle. How come? Why did the President allow that to happen? Isn't that negligence of duty? Give me the money and I'll make the complaint in court.
What was he so busy doing- apologizing about America, the savior of this planet? Now he's doing a benghazi on Venezuela. The people - women, children, and men- are suffering from hunger and thirst due to - once again!- another failed socialist economy, and he is doing nothing. He may not be, but Americans are better than that. I call upon the people of America - We, the people, We, the government- to start pushing our lazy, morally challenged, federal employees to
get moving on aiding Venezuela. If our mostly worthless federal employees, excepting many such as those in the Armed Services, don't respond, I ask that we, the people, start without them. An excellent resource would be getting your pastors involved with collecting food and drink for the Venezuelans. The Venezuelans are so ignorant and brain-washed about economics, that they may hate us capitalists, but helping them survive their socialist economy, now on its last leg, is the right thing to do. I'd go to my Episcopal church but gave up on it a year ago when the high priest showed no interest in the Copts being killed in the Middle East. Hillary and socialism are two peas in the same pods, and people starving to death under socialism is a tragic part of that insane ideology, so I do not expect her to show any initiative as it would be calling attention to the failure of socialism. Let'em die, we're going to stick to our crazy ideology! What else can crazies do? But where is Trump on this?
Peter Nickerson, Philosophy Major
Monday, September 12, 2016
Palestinian Refugees Destroy Lebanon III
Great waves of Palestinians sought refuge in Jordan in 1948 and again in 1967 as the Arab nations wages war on the little sliver of land, the Nation of Israel. A
terrorist organization know as the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) was set up inside Jordan and used Jordan as a base of operations to launch terrorist attacks into Israel. From the Gaza, Egypt based high level intelligence officers from the Egyptian armies and task them with inflaming the Arabs in Palestine with hate and paranoia toward Israel, badgering them to become terrorists, and aiding them to strike Israelis. Jordan king, Hussein, did not like such a militant group in his country and in 1970, he had the PLO expelled by force from his country. Thousands of Palestinian Arabs were killed by Jordanian Arabs including the PLO shooters and ordinary people who weren't fighters.
This exodus out of Jordan hastened the destruction of loving, open, Christian
Lebanon who took in the initially grateful Palestinians. Things quickly changed as writer Brigitte Gabriel showed in Because They Hate.
History is prelude. What the Palestinian Muslims did in beautiful, Christian Lebanon in spite of the efforts of Israel who was endlessly, and unfactually villified, is happening to Europe. She is now taking in Muslim refugees from Islamic Sharia Law countries, and Saudi Arabia is following right behind them with billions of petrodollars, investing them in pro-terrorism activities, such as building mosques in Europe. For Saudi Arabia to do that shows great and unmanly hypocrisy to the world and ill-will to the millions of poor people in the oil-rich Arabic lands. The hypocrisy is that Saudi Arabia builds mosques all around the world yet will not allow Jews, Christians, and other religious people to build temples or churches in Saudi Arabia. Other religions aren't even allowed to practice their religion in Saudi Arabia. This is weak, effeminate behavior on the part of the Saudis. The Saudi should not expect other people to allow their mosques if they won't allow temples and churches in their land. There is no manhood in being a weasel even if you get what you want. You are still a weasel and not a man. The ill-will the Saudi and other oil billlionaires are showing the poor Arabs in the Middle East is that the billions of petrodollars are going for spreading terrorism -jihad- in other countries rather than trying to improve the lot of the poor by strengthening individual freedom, initiative to invent and innovate so the Arabs have something to sell but oil and camels, education (not religious hate) and property rights, and honesty to get rid of the crippling corruption. These cultural changes would allow people to have more skills and become more employable, and able to make services, innovations, and even inventions that would bring in more money and more and higher-paying employment. Instead, the billions go to promoting hate and jihad.
Peter Nickerson, Philosophy Major, Class of '68, William and Mary,
"The measure of a man
Is not what he says,
But what he does,
And what he allows others,
To do in his presence."
Navy Seal Instructor
terrorist organization know as the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) was set up inside Jordan and used Jordan as a base of operations to launch terrorist attacks into Israel. From the Gaza, Egypt based high level intelligence officers from the Egyptian armies and task them with inflaming the Arabs in Palestine with hate and paranoia toward Israel, badgering them to become terrorists, and aiding them to strike Israelis. Jordan king, Hussein, did not like such a militant group in his country and in 1970, he had the PLO expelled by force from his country. Thousands of Palestinian Arabs were killed by Jordanian Arabs including the PLO shooters and ordinary people who weren't fighters.
This exodus out of Jordan hastened the destruction of loving, open, Christian
Lebanon who took in the initially grateful Palestinians. Things quickly changed as writer Brigitte Gabriel showed in Because They Hate.
History is prelude. What the Palestinian Muslims did in beautiful, Christian Lebanon in spite of the efforts of Israel who was endlessly, and unfactually villified, is happening to Europe. She is now taking in Muslim refugees from Islamic Sharia Law countries, and Saudi Arabia is following right behind them with billions of petrodollars, investing them in pro-terrorism activities, such as building mosques in Europe. For Saudi Arabia to do that shows great and unmanly hypocrisy to the world and ill-will to the millions of poor people in the oil-rich Arabic lands. The hypocrisy is that Saudi Arabia builds mosques all around the world yet will not allow Jews, Christians, and other religious people to build temples or churches in Saudi Arabia. Other religions aren't even allowed to practice their religion in Saudi Arabia. This is weak, effeminate behavior on the part of the Saudis. The Saudi should not expect other people to allow their mosques if they won't allow temples and churches in their land. There is no manhood in being a weasel even if you get what you want. You are still a weasel and not a man. The ill-will the Saudi and other oil billlionaires are showing the poor Arabs in the Middle East is that the billions of petrodollars are going for spreading terrorism -jihad- in other countries rather than trying to improve the lot of the poor by strengthening individual freedom, initiative to invent and innovate so the Arabs have something to sell but oil and camels, education (not religious hate) and property rights, and honesty to get rid of the crippling corruption. These cultural changes would allow people to have more skills and become more employable, and able to make services, innovations, and even inventions that would bring in more money and more and higher-paying employment. Instead, the billions go to promoting hate and jihad.
Peter Nickerson, Philosophy Major, Class of '68, William and Mary,
"The measure of a man
Is not what he says,
But what he does,
And what he allows others,
To do in his presence."
Navy Seal Instructor
Friday, September 9, 2016
Why NotTo Join The Islamic State
It is the end of the work- week in America and time to see what I have learned this week, if anything, to try to dissuade you from the faith of Sharia Islam which I believe is a totalitarian faith of hate and death and is the Islamic State's faith upon pain of death or maybe conversion or maybe submission with many indignities including criminal acts rained down upon you as a non-person. Giving up the faith is a death sentence also. My reading has led to understanding Islamic heaven as a place you don't want to be in. It is very concentrated on animal satisfaction- shade for comfort, non-intoxicating wine for drink, and part-women and boys for sex. The part-women, the "houri," are only part women, as described in the Quran, and the rest of them is something else. They also regrow their hymens after each act of genital penetration so that they are always virgins. The Quran doesn't address if these creatures feel continued discomfort being perpetually deflowered. I would think they would. Having sex with boys is a perversion that no one should look forward to. The Catholic Church has had to pay dearly in reputation for allowing that perversion by its priests, and Islam should too. That perversion needs to be stricken from the Quran immediately. My copy of the Quran tries to hide the practice by saying "...youths like unguarded pearls..." That's not good enough. Boys for sex in Islamic paradise has to go. The Quran is not perfect and must be changed in a big way to reflect this change. Child sexual abuse must be eliminated as a promise in Islamic paradise.
Take a look at it: You're promised sex with only intact hymens on part-human women and sex with boys. If you're a fairly normal person, where on the spectrum from heaven to hell, does life in Islam's Paradise lie? I'd say on the hell end. I wouldn't want to be there. Why would you?
Peter Nickerson, Philosophy Major, Class of '68, William and Mary
"The measure of a man,
Is not what he says,
But what he does,
And what he allows others,
To do in his presence."
-Navy Seal Instructor
"Free Will is your ability to be rational in spite of irrational ideas from your genes and your experiences including the one you are presently having." Peter Nickerson, Philosophy Major
Take a look at it: You're promised sex with only intact hymens on part-human women and sex with boys. If you're a fairly normal person, where on the spectrum from heaven to hell, does life in Islam's Paradise lie? I'd say on the hell end. I wouldn't want to be there. Why would you?
Peter Nickerson, Philosophy Major, Class of '68, William and Mary
"The measure of a man,
Is not what he says,
But what he does,
And what he allows others,
To do in his presence."
-Navy Seal Instructor
"Free Will is your ability to be rational in spite of irrational ideas from your genes and your experiences including the one you are presently having." Peter Nickerson, Philosophy Major
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)