I called New Hampshire Governor John Sunnunu's office today, and his aide had not heard any talk about putting metal detectors and gunpowder sniffing dogs at schools. To my asking, she replied that he was pro- Second Amendment. I asked the aide if she would find out why he's not demanding detectors and dogs.
I started to call the Vermont state representatives, but they did not have offices except for one Senator, and he had a robot.
I read in the Wall Street Journal today that the Texas governor has apparently never heard of metal detectors and dogs or has ruled them out because his new plans for schools don't include them. Instead he wants to come down harder on the citizen: He wants to require secure safety lockers for guns in your homes. fine you more if you don't have them, and require that the age of your kids be lengthened during which you as their parents are liable for their gun violence. You'd voted him into office? I plan to call and try to find out why he didn't push for detectors and dogs. I urge you to call as many legislators as you can and ask why no detectors and dogs. Be as forceful as you can. Make an impression. Blow their doors off. Remember, it could be your child, grandchild, niece, nephew next. Do it for the children! And when there's another school shooting, and you see the politicians and the security people wringing their hands and crying, spit on your screen. Nick
Thursday, May 31, 2018
Saturday, May 26, 2018
School Shootings #4
Both the spokesmen for Bernie Sanders and Vermont Congressman Peter Welch seemed to rebut my premise that if you are against metal detectors and gunpowder dogs, you are for the massacre of schoolchildren as a pretext for taking the individual's guns. I didn't challenge that, but I will with future assertions. I'm admittedly a literalist, but what else would be the reason for not having detectors and dogs that makes sense? I know about the crazies, the psychopaths, the ACLU, and, of course, the Russians. The world isn't perfect and isn't going to be.
I see that South Carolina Representative Wendell Gilliard has long been a supporter of metal detectors in schools and that Boston Chief of Police for Public Schools, Eric Weston, praises metal detectors for keeping guns entirely out of schools and reducing the number of knives. He recommends metal detectors. I'd like to ask these gentlemen if they have been attacked for their praise of metal detectors and why. If they have been attacked, I'd like to ask if they suspected the motivation of the attackers was that the attackers didn't seem to want a solution to school shootings. I'd like to know if any attackers either blatantly said or implied that finding a solution to school shootings through metal detectors and gunpowder dogs obscured "the larger problem" of individual gun ownership. Finding anyone sick or stupid enough to say that would be the motherlode to my thesis that collectivists don't care about individuals, indeed would happily murder them for structure that strengthens central command. In this case, the structure would be a law banning gun ownership by the individual.
Only central command could own guns. Which means the Obama/Clinton Progressive Party which has already infiltrated the top echelons of the FBI, CIA, and NSA. I guess I have to go now and catch my missile. Nick
I see that South Carolina Representative Wendell Gilliard has long been a supporter of metal detectors in schools and that Boston Chief of Police for Public Schools, Eric Weston, praises metal detectors for keeping guns entirely out of schools and reducing the number of knives. He recommends metal detectors. I'd like to ask these gentlemen if they have been attacked for their praise of metal detectors and why. If they have been attacked, I'd like to ask if they suspected the motivation of the attackers was that the attackers didn't seem to want a solution to school shootings. I'd like to know if any attackers either blatantly said or implied that finding a solution to school shootings through metal detectors and gunpowder dogs obscured "the larger problem" of individual gun ownership. Finding anyone sick or stupid enough to say that would be the motherlode to my thesis that collectivists don't care about individuals, indeed would happily murder them for structure that strengthens central command. In this case, the structure would be a law banning gun ownership by the individual.
Only central command could own guns. Which means the Obama/Clinton Progressive Party which has already infiltrated the top echelons of the FBI, CIA, and NSA. I guess I have to go now and catch my missile. Nick
Friday, May 25, 2018
School Shootings #3
Today, I tried to call President Trump but had to settle for comments to him. I asked this question" "Does President Trump not demanding metal detectors and gunpowder-sniffing dogs at schools because he wants more schoolchildren shot so guns will be banned?
The lady took the question and promised to get it to him. I asked that he call me. She laughed. I then tried to call the governor of Vermont, but my number didn't work. Instead, I got the governor of Alabama's office, and asked the same question. I was shuttled about twice and then had to leave a message with law enforcement. Next, I called Senator Bernie Sanders office. I asked the question, and things got a little tense for some reason. He's not for allowing kids to be shot at school, but I heard no support of metal detectors or gunpowder dogs. If someone didn't want kids to be shot why wouldn't they support metal detectors and gunpowder dogs? Why can't we assume that if they don't support metal detectors and gunpowder dogs at school then they do want schoolchildren shot.
You can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't say you want to leave your schoolchildren without entrance security and say you don't want them shot. Your actions speak louder than your words. I told the rather hostile speaker that I wanted to get ahead of the school shooters by metal detectors and gunpowder dogs already at the school waiting for them. I told her you could secure metal detectors immediately but it would be a long wait before there were no more guns in America. ( Like never. Just look at the farcical "War On Drugs." Or go back a bit more and look at the farcical "Prohibition" of alcohol. Both failed because they were undemocratic. People want drugs and alcohol and any sane person wants a gun too.) Swords drawn, the Bernie speaker and I said goodbye.
Maybe Bernie will eventually get back with me about what his position on civil forfeiture is. I asked his representative that question last August at the nice luncheon he threw in Brattleboro, Vermont.
I then called Congressman Peter Welch and asked the metal detector and dogs question. The speaker was not at all transparent; he only said that more funds for school security were being asked but wouldn't say what for.
At Senator Leahy's office, I had to leave a message to please call me back.
So that's how it goes. Not very impressive. I don't see the love for schoolchildren, only blather. Nick
The lady took the question and promised to get it to him. I asked that he call me. She laughed. I then tried to call the governor of Vermont, but my number didn't work. Instead, I got the governor of Alabama's office, and asked the same question. I was shuttled about twice and then had to leave a message with law enforcement. Next, I called Senator Bernie Sanders office. I asked the question, and things got a little tense for some reason. He's not for allowing kids to be shot at school, but I heard no support of metal detectors or gunpowder dogs. If someone didn't want kids to be shot why wouldn't they support metal detectors and gunpowder dogs? Why can't we assume that if they don't support metal detectors and gunpowder dogs at school then they do want schoolchildren shot.
You can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't say you want to leave your schoolchildren without entrance security and say you don't want them shot. Your actions speak louder than your words. I told the rather hostile speaker that I wanted to get ahead of the school shooters by metal detectors and gunpowder dogs already at the school waiting for them. I told her you could secure metal detectors immediately but it would be a long wait before there were no more guns in America. ( Like never. Just look at the farcical "War On Drugs." Or go back a bit more and look at the farcical "Prohibition" of alcohol. Both failed because they were undemocratic. People want drugs and alcohol and any sane person wants a gun too.) Swords drawn, the Bernie speaker and I said goodbye.
Maybe Bernie will eventually get back with me about what his position on civil forfeiture is. I asked his representative that question last August at the nice luncheon he threw in Brattleboro, Vermont.
I then called Congressman Peter Welch and asked the metal detector and dogs question. The speaker was not at all transparent; he only said that more funds for school security were being asked but wouldn't say what for.
At Senator Leahy's office, I had to leave a message to please call me back.
So that's how it goes. Not very impressive. I don't see the love for schoolchildren, only blather. Nick
Wednesday, May 23, 2018
School Shootings #2
A quick google search showed that there are schools using metal detectors and gunpowder-detecting dogs. I trust if they're doing that, they are guarding all the entrances. I also see that the ACLU is acting against the safety of children, educators, and law enforcement by opposing these measures. So why is there only talk about guns restrictions on all the TV stations I've seen except for Fox. I think it is because the freedom haters see the slaughter to schoolchildren as the vehicle to ride to confiscate Americans' guns. Thus, they and the ACLU will hush or oppose metal detectors and gunpowder dogs at controlled entrances to schools because they want children to be killed to further their malicious campaign to take the individual's gun ownership away.
Parents who support having their children live should call their school board members and superintendent and promise them they will do their best to have the parents' of any shot students in the future sue them both as school employees and personally. Because of moral relativism, you can't appeal to the consciences of these less-than-animals. They only care about their money and prestige. Sue them and take both away!
Parents who support having their children live should call their school board members and superintendent and promise them they will do their best to have the parents' of any shot students in the future sue them both as school employees and personally. Because of moral relativism, you can't appeal to the consciences of these less-than-animals. They only care about their money and prestige. Sue them and take both away!
Saturday, May 19, 2018
School Shootings
I get the feeling that students are protesting the possession of firearms not because this is the immediate solution to school shootings but because they are the useful idiots of their leftists teachers who are not interested in their students' safety or their own, but in the elimination of firearms ownership by free individuals. I say this with the qualifications that I do not have television or access to the internet except at the public library. I could easily be missing something [ yes, I know, leftists: I'm missing a brain.] What makes me say that is the immediate solution is not the confiscation of firearms, but stopping would-be shooters from entering schools. You can't eliminate evil, but you can block it. That can be done by having a single point of entry into a school plus metal detectors for firearms made of metal plus gunpowder sniffing dogs at the single point of entry for firearms made of non-metallic parts.
I say this is no guarantee that no firearms would get into schools but it the metal detectors and gunpowder sniffing dogs should eliminate most firearms. Plus, it would serve as a real deterrent. These kids doing the shooting are not Navy Seals. They are fragile, troubled snowflakes who need boundaries and cognitive-behavioral therapy. If they know they will have to stand in line for metal detectors and gunpowder sniffing dogs, most will crack at the thought and not bring a gun. Those who do will try to brave the waiting in line, the detectors, the dogs will show signs of stress. If our police and school personnel will become as smart and sophisticated as the Israelis, they will put down their doughnuts and Red Books and look for tells of stress. Then they will politely and respectfully engage the student and do a body and belongings search.
Maybe students are already asking for these precautions. If you are, then I apologize for taking you to task. Your idea of eliminating guns is quixotic and wrong. Look how well the prohibition on drugs starting in 1914 has worked. Has it eliminated drugs? No! All it's done is to give trillions of dollars to the drug cartels, law enforcement, and lawyers, created more lethal types of drugs, and put millions of mainly blacks and Hispanics into jail, thus ruining their employment opportunities for life. Look at well the prohibition on alcohol worked. It was ignored until it was lifted. This is a democracy. People want alcohol, drugs, and guns. The vast majority of people use alcohol, drugs, and guns without getting into trouble. The shallow, macho people want to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Being mean makes them manly and strong, they think. Don't fall for the shallow end of the genetic pool, students. Be truly strong and macho. Think, read, watch, discuss, and experience. Get out of man-made pseudo-reality and go into nature and observe how reality works!
I say this is no guarantee that no firearms would get into schools but it the metal detectors and gunpowder sniffing dogs should eliminate most firearms. Plus, it would serve as a real deterrent. These kids doing the shooting are not Navy Seals. They are fragile, troubled snowflakes who need boundaries and cognitive-behavioral therapy. If they know they will have to stand in line for metal detectors and gunpowder sniffing dogs, most will crack at the thought and not bring a gun. Those who do will try to brave the waiting in line, the detectors, the dogs will show signs of stress. If our police and school personnel will become as smart and sophisticated as the Israelis, they will put down their doughnuts and Red Books and look for tells of stress. Then they will politely and respectfully engage the student and do a body and belongings search.
Maybe students are already asking for these precautions. If you are, then I apologize for taking you to task. Your idea of eliminating guns is quixotic and wrong. Look how well the prohibition on drugs starting in 1914 has worked. Has it eliminated drugs? No! All it's done is to give trillions of dollars to the drug cartels, law enforcement, and lawyers, created more lethal types of drugs, and put millions of mainly blacks and Hispanics into jail, thus ruining their employment opportunities for life. Look at well the prohibition on alcohol worked. It was ignored until it was lifted. This is a democracy. People want alcohol, drugs, and guns. The vast majority of people use alcohol, drugs, and guns without getting into trouble. The shallow, macho people want to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Being mean makes them manly and strong, they think. Don't fall for the shallow end of the genetic pool, students. Be truly strong and macho. Think, read, watch, discuss, and experience. Get out of man-made pseudo-reality and go into nature and observe how reality works!
Saturday, April 28, 2018
Best Bigfoot Bait
I have an idea for the best Bigfoot bait yet: take a can with a pop-top tab. Insert a stiff but pliable thin wire under the tab without breaking the seal so the contents will remain fresh. Run the wire up through the hole in the tab and wind it around the the stem of the wire. Tie the other end of the wire to the limb or trunk of a tree. You can tie it up high enough so that a black bear can't reach. Let your can of food hang there until Bigfoot finds it. He will pull the can off the wire, pulling the top off, and find inside fresh food or drink. Replace can with a new can as soon as practical so he will be rewarded if he comes back. If you get one coming in, set out a trail camera. Is it de rigeur that all Bigfoot pictures be blurry? Get your picture and videos and cause Big Development to have a collective heart attack. I think your best bet at getting a regular customer is to put out a 25 ounce can of Bud. Budweiser cans are the only ones sturdy enough to run a wire under and through the hole in the tab without opening. Besides, a Big Man needs a Big Bud. Every animal with a brain seeks to get outside of himself, seeks an altered state of consciousness, and Bigfoot is no exception. A beer will draw him in the best, but you can put out dog food - sliced dog food is the best- or cans of soda which cost next to nothing.
If you live around Pisagh State Park in New Hampshire and have some woods, I would love to put out some cans on your property and monitor them. Please help a poor, old, lonely man redeem himself by finding fortune and fame in his final years by videoing Bigfoot quaffing a Bud! I'm Peter Nickerson at 352-359-0850. Peter or Two-Guns or Nick. All my names. I must be part Arab.
When you put out some cans, would you let me know how you're doing with them. peternickerson12@yahoo.com Go Bigfoot. Eat shit Big Development.
If you live around Pisagh State Park in New Hampshire and have some woods, I would love to put out some cans on your property and monitor them. Please help a poor, old, lonely man redeem himself by finding fortune and fame in his final years by videoing Bigfoot quaffing a Bud! I'm Peter Nickerson at 352-359-0850. Peter or Two-Guns or Nick. All my names. I must be part Arab.
When you put out some cans, would you let me know how you're doing with them. peternickerson12@yahoo.com Go Bigfoot. Eat shit Big Development.
Saturday, March 10, 2018
Cop Cowardice In Parkland Shootings!
Would you really like to hear from a poor person instead of just the elites? One who has no television or Internet and sits on a plastic chair or are you just a virtue actor? From almost the bottom, this is my take on the Parkland school shootings: The most immediate cause was the Cruiz kid of course. The second was the cowardice of the first cop and the first three to arrive at the scene. I've seen some Fox news coverage and seen the talking heads analyze the four cops' behavior. The closest anyone will come to "gutless" is "lack of training." I was disappointed that was the best Fox could do in getting talking heads. They were so sanitized, gelded, and gutless. Fox news needs to get another head on its panels from the ranks of the real people - those who struggle. Fox can even call it their "wild card" to try to distance themselves from the nitty-gritty perspectives of the struggling. I'll try.
You do not need "training" to have guts though it makes it easier. Any decent man with a gun outside that high school would have responded to the shooting inside by going inside. Perhaps, some armed women would have too. Two hours ago, I was getting free senior coffee at a generous fast food store. There was a woman outside with a suitcase on wheels. She looked like a homeless person. She walked away from the restaurant, got up to the road, and purposefully went down on her knees. No sooner had her knees hit the side of the road, than a car stopped and two women got out and assisted her to the next fast food restaurant to perch for a while. This took no social work training, it took common decency.
Those four cops were lacking common decency because they were cowards.
I can tell you that hostile gunfire is extremely threatening. In Florida once, I was using an electronic caller to see if I could draw in a "non-existent" (as the game wardens insisted) panther in North-Central Florida. A nearby turkey hunter didn't appreciate the racket I was making with my dyeing rabbit cassette so he opened up with first his shotgun, and firing all his shots in that, opened up with his pistol and fired all his shots in that. As far as I could tell, he wasn't firing a me. My first desire was to curl up in a fetal position on the ground and hide like a baby. But without any "training," I fired into the ground several shots from my two handguns to let him know I was armed and willing to defend myself. The turkey hunter responded by walking away from me, firing shots as he put distance between us.
Now, the POS shooting kids in the school was obviously no turkey hunter. Someone who shoots kids has earned the POS appellation. Why would you be afraid of a POS? Surely, you're much better than him. I wonder if any of the news commentators has mentioned the problem of cowardice with Florida militia-not-men during the 1800s Indian Wars. Their cowardliness became so exasperating that either General Jessup or General Harrison made a public speech in which he urged all married Florida women to divorce their husbands and marry men from the other states so they would have the guts to protect their wives and families from the Indians.
Also, if the high school kids know about this cowardice by the four cops, why aren't they attacking that as well as guns? Why aren't they saying anything about the fact that Cruiz verbalized doing harm to others with his guns. Why aren't they calling for a law that mandates any person hearing someone saying he is going to shoot someone must report it to the police. I think these kids are opening themselves up to charges of anti-gun crisis actors if they remain only focused on guns. It's not very mature, but then they are kids. The same thing holds for law enforcement's ignoring multiple calls about Cruiz. What's the simplest reason? Occam's Razor. They wanted it to happen so there would be a hue and cry about guns? Or public organizations are so lazy and secure because they don't have to make a profit or compete with other organizations as private businesses do, they know they can get away with murder? Take your pick or
two.
Nick Nickerson 352-259-0850 peternickerson12@yahoo.com
You do not need "training" to have guts though it makes it easier. Any decent man with a gun outside that high school would have responded to the shooting inside by going inside. Perhaps, some armed women would have too. Two hours ago, I was getting free senior coffee at a generous fast food store. There was a woman outside with a suitcase on wheels. She looked like a homeless person. She walked away from the restaurant, got up to the road, and purposefully went down on her knees. No sooner had her knees hit the side of the road, than a car stopped and two women got out and assisted her to the next fast food restaurant to perch for a while. This took no social work training, it took common decency.
Those four cops were lacking common decency because they were cowards.
I can tell you that hostile gunfire is extremely threatening. In Florida once, I was using an electronic caller to see if I could draw in a "non-existent" (as the game wardens insisted) panther in North-Central Florida. A nearby turkey hunter didn't appreciate the racket I was making with my dyeing rabbit cassette so he opened up with first his shotgun, and firing all his shots in that, opened up with his pistol and fired all his shots in that. As far as I could tell, he wasn't firing a me. My first desire was to curl up in a fetal position on the ground and hide like a baby. But without any "training," I fired into the ground several shots from my two handguns to let him know I was armed and willing to defend myself. The turkey hunter responded by walking away from me, firing shots as he put distance between us.
Now, the POS shooting kids in the school was obviously no turkey hunter. Someone who shoots kids has earned the POS appellation. Why would you be afraid of a POS? Surely, you're much better than him. I wonder if any of the news commentators has mentioned the problem of cowardice with Florida militia-not-men during the 1800s Indian Wars. Their cowardliness became so exasperating that either General Jessup or General Harrison made a public speech in which he urged all married Florida women to divorce their husbands and marry men from the other states so they would have the guts to protect their wives and families from the Indians.
Also, if the high school kids know about this cowardice by the four cops, why aren't they attacking that as well as guns? Why aren't they saying anything about the fact that Cruiz verbalized doing harm to others with his guns. Why aren't they calling for a law that mandates any person hearing someone saying he is going to shoot someone must report it to the police. I think these kids are opening themselves up to charges of anti-gun crisis actors if they remain only focused on guns. It's not very mature, but then they are kids. The same thing holds for law enforcement's ignoring multiple calls about Cruiz. What's the simplest reason? Occam's Razor. They wanted it to happen so there would be a hue and cry about guns? Or public organizations are so lazy and secure because they don't have to make a profit or compete with other organizations as private businesses do, they know they can get away with murder? Take your pick or
two.
Nick Nickerson 352-259-0850 peternickerson12@yahoo.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)