Supposedly, the first school shooting took place during Pontiac's War in Greencastle, Pennsylvania [which seems a little south of where Pontiac's War took place] on July 26, 1764. A band of Delaware Indians broke into a schoolhouse, shot and killed the teacher, Enoch Brown, and then, apparently using knives and tomahawks, injured two and killed seven students.
Another strange event took place when a six year old female child shot and killed a classmate in 2000. I went to the website, I think, Dr. Claudia for this information.
Next, I found that Google is selling metal detectors, wands to walk-throughs- for only $30 to $4,000.
Meandering around the internet, I read that parents at the Douglas High School are petitioning the school elites to allow them - the parents!- to buy metal detectors. The people are seizing the initiative because the school elites, either consciously or unconsciously, really don't want to stop school shootings because they want to ride them until they get guns get banned.
Let me give another reason why I think that is a plausible scenario: School elites are overwhelmingly leftists. Leftists are communists. Communism believes that increasing the power of the State - the government employees- should be the ultimate objective of every person. In communist countries, if you do not support the ultimate objective you will, at best, be punished until you do. At worst, you will be tortured to death. Now what do communists hate? The armed citizen.
Being armed gives the individual chutzpah he will never have unarmed. In communism, only the supreme dictator can have chutzpah. The rest of the population is castrated and must grovel before the supreme dictator. Obviously, the armed citizen is a threat to communists, and the communists are nothing if not paranoid- we see that with college students on campuses- as what they're doing is horrible and they project that upon others. What is "sacrificing" a few hundred school children to the greater good of disarming the individual? After all, Stalin killed at least twenty million people in the name of the State. It couldn't happen in America? Why not if Americans have the same ideas as Stalin? People act out their ideas. It's already happening on many college campuses.
Ross Berman of the Berman Law Group in Boca Raton has become unhappy with the procrastination of the Parkland school officials in providing defenses in schools to school shooters. So he is trying to get the alumni of high schools to buy metal detectors and has named his plan "The Alumni Challenge."
But the school elites are fighting back. These leftists -communists- are saying that schools don't have the money or staff. They also say using wands in random checks would be unfair. They are putting conditions on accepting detectors and insisting that any security initiatives would have to be coordinated with school district. They are saying they don't want "their"schools to look like prisons. In other words, they want to stop school security measures through endless meetings that do nothing but nit-pick forever. They are using any lie or difficulty they can find to keep the schools undefended. Again, this is entirely consistent with the leftists -the collectivists. Haven't they always been against America spending for military defense? Aren't they against walls or other defenses against illegals trying to get into America? Of course, they would be against defending schools from shooters. But don't expect them to admit to it. The only time a collectivist isn't lying is when he admits you caught him in a lie! I say that the parents of school children injured or killed in the next school shooting should band together and hire a lawyer to sue their school officials, both personally and professionally, for criminal negligence.
Ross Berman, a lawyer, undoubtedly knows a game when he sees one so he
has hired a public relations firm to try to deal with the Parkland school officials' criminal negligence in not providing defenses, not even after a school shooting massacre. The go-to person in that firm is Lynn Aronberg. A few hours ago, I called the Berman Law Firm. I found the receptionist impossible to understand initially and had to ask, "I'm speaking English. Are you?" But things got better, and she will pass on to her supervisor a request to Ross Berman to either call or email me. I would like to know if he suspects that either consciously or unconsciously school officials oppose defending schools from shooters.
Nick 352-359-0850 peternickerson12@yahoo.com
Pitchfork Time - As you may know, the Justice Department and the FBI are stonewalling efforts by Congress to get documents that will shed light on Russiagate. Recently, Congress finally got some highly redacted transcripts of a conversation between the two FBI lovers Strzok and Page. Come to find out, the FBI had chosen to redact - blacken out- a part where the two lovers discussed Deputy Director McCabe's $70,000 conference table. Yes, a $70,000 conference table for McCabe. Now that's a real patriot! You see why the government employees don't want the individual armed? They're the beast.
Friday, June 8, 2018
Thursday, June 7, 2018
School Shootings #11
My calls to the Brattleboro school system were apparently rewarded with this friendly call-back: "This is ------ ------ (I couldn't make out the name as voice was faint), Superindent of Schools, Vermont, returning your call." For those aspiring to professionalism, let me make two points about this call. First, you speak the person's name so I can be sure the call is directed to me. Second, you give the call-back number so I can return the call. I think in this call, professionalism was trumped by hostility.
To those trusting people who don't think the elite can willingly kill people to get what it wants, let me tell you about this: You want the best airplane controllers possible so you base your applications on merit. Right? But not Obama. He added the "Background Questionnaire" to see if people could claim poverty and other hardships when growing up. These disadvantages would make you a better air controller? Hardly. In fact, the more difficulties you have in life, the greater the chance that you would have issues that would get in the way of the high-stress job of airplane traffic controller. But in Obama's collectivist world, these disadvantages could outweigh merit. In addition, if you reported a happy childhood, you would be disqualified from being an airplane traffic controller (this comes from the credible Wall Street Journal, folks). Isn't this crazy and highly dangerous to the people flying in those airplanes? It sounded more like Obama was trying to find candidates for psychotherapy! My point is that when this plan of supplanting merit by sob stories (were they even checked out for veracity?) was presented by Obama, the elites in the US Transportation Department and the elites in the Federal Aviation Administration sat on their weak, fat asses and said nothing to protect the American people in airplanes eight miles up in the sky from this insanity.
If the elites will do that to us, then they will ignore defending schools from shooters by using metal detectors and gunpowder-sniffing Labradors at school entrances in order to pursue the collectivists' dream of banning gun ownership in America. Stand up by calling or emailing your school board member - just one- and ask her for her position in defending schools from shooters by using metal detectors and gunpowder-sniffing dogs at the entrances. Would you let me know how it goes? Join me in the battle to protect the children! Nick 352-359-0850 peternickerson12@yahoo.com
To those trusting people who don't think the elite can willingly kill people to get what it wants, let me tell you about this: You want the best airplane controllers possible so you base your applications on merit. Right? But not Obama. He added the "Background Questionnaire" to see if people could claim poverty and other hardships when growing up. These disadvantages would make you a better air controller? Hardly. In fact, the more difficulties you have in life, the greater the chance that you would have issues that would get in the way of the high-stress job of airplane traffic controller. But in Obama's collectivist world, these disadvantages could outweigh merit. In addition, if you reported a happy childhood, you would be disqualified from being an airplane traffic controller (this comes from the credible Wall Street Journal, folks). Isn't this crazy and highly dangerous to the people flying in those airplanes? It sounded more like Obama was trying to find candidates for psychotherapy! My point is that when this plan of supplanting merit by sob stories (were they even checked out for veracity?) was presented by Obama, the elites in the US Transportation Department and the elites in the Federal Aviation Administration sat on their weak, fat asses and said nothing to protect the American people in airplanes eight miles up in the sky from this insanity.
If the elites will do that to us, then they will ignore defending schools from shooters by using metal detectors and gunpowder-sniffing Labradors at school entrances in order to pursue the collectivists' dream of banning gun ownership in America. Stand up by calling or emailing your school board member - just one- and ask her for her position in defending schools from shooters by using metal detectors and gunpowder-sniffing dogs at the entrances. Would you let me know how it goes? Join me in the battle to protect the children! Nick 352-359-0850 peternickerson12@yahoo.com
Wednesday, June 6, 2018
School Shootings #10
Did I stumble into a rigid bureaucracy today! I called the Brattleboro school system trying to find out if anyone was discussing metal detectors and gunpowder sniffing dogs and got curtly shuffled from one employee to another, ending up with leaving a message for an assistant to please call me. As I waited on the phone, trying to find a human to talk to, I wondered how many administrators have been injured or killed in school shootings. They certainly seem either absent or inaccessible. They wouldn't even give me a school board member's phone number. Now that's real democracy. The whole experience of calling the school board was authoritarian. Let's see if I hear from the superintendent. I called 802-451-3400 first and then 802-254-3730.
I also called Texas US Representative Roberto Alonzo, 512-463-0408, but was asked to email him.
The Wall Street Journal recently published some news about a student who simply saw Charles Williams shooting his father's .22 revolver at school students. I believe a shot from a .22 will knock over a human only thirty percent of the time. It is the smallest calibre. Charles Williams killed two students and wounded thirteen. The student who saw him shooting says that seventeen years later Charles Williams "ruined" his life as he sought relief in drugs and has untreated PTSD.
I mentioned this because yesterday I wrote against teaching boys to be less stoic and more feminine. Of course, I'm not talking about extreme stoicism as when my father told me to kill my beagle puppy, his mother, and other beagles in our kennel when they got distemper. I had to use a lead pipe and beat them to death. That was asking too much of a little boy, and I think just about every father knows that. I'm talking about sucking it up and doing the job in less painful situations. America simply can not afford to have males too sensitive to defend America. This can happen. I had a girlfriend whose husband was Japanese and being born after WW II was a pacifist. This was fine in Brattleboro, the most loving city in the nation in the most loving state in the US - Vermont.
But it didn't work so well on an outing at a bar in Mexico one evening. A very macho American, a local, began buying them drinks, trying to get them drunk. Then he began insisting they take a ride in his cadillac to his house. My girlfriend was playmate beautiful, and she told me that she realized then that her husband would not protect her. He was a pacifist. Finally, they were able to get themselves away from this aggressive man. We do not want Americans to be so passive that they will not protect their families and their country. ISIS, China, North Korea, Russia, and Iran will quickly enslave us. We who they let live. It's not realistic to be passive. The world is not a utopia and never will be because there are finite resources with infinite needs from humans.
Did you notice the lie in the Maine Boys To Men Program. It had stated that
the problem wasn't with boys but with the culture, but in reality they were "working" with boys not the culture. Working with the culture would be putting up signs, going on television, writing articles, that sort of thing. They didn't do that. Instead, they are working with boys using conversion therapy to get rid of their "toxic" masculinity. You lied! But why, one may ask. The answer is follow the money. There's third party funding - the school system- available for "treating" kids with conversion therapy so they won't be school shooters, but no
money to be had working with the "culture" whatever that is. Nick
I also called Texas US Representative Roberto Alonzo, 512-463-0408, but was asked to email him.
The Wall Street Journal recently published some news about a student who simply saw Charles Williams shooting his father's .22 revolver at school students. I believe a shot from a .22 will knock over a human only thirty percent of the time. It is the smallest calibre. Charles Williams killed two students and wounded thirteen. The student who saw him shooting says that seventeen years later Charles Williams "ruined" his life as he sought relief in drugs and has untreated PTSD.
I mentioned this because yesterday I wrote against teaching boys to be less stoic and more feminine. Of course, I'm not talking about extreme stoicism as when my father told me to kill my beagle puppy, his mother, and other beagles in our kennel when they got distemper. I had to use a lead pipe and beat them to death. That was asking too much of a little boy, and I think just about every father knows that. I'm talking about sucking it up and doing the job in less painful situations. America simply can not afford to have males too sensitive to defend America. This can happen. I had a girlfriend whose husband was Japanese and being born after WW II was a pacifist. This was fine in Brattleboro, the most loving city in the nation in the most loving state in the US - Vermont.
But it didn't work so well on an outing at a bar in Mexico one evening. A very macho American, a local, began buying them drinks, trying to get them drunk. Then he began insisting they take a ride in his cadillac to his house. My girlfriend was playmate beautiful, and she told me that she realized then that her husband would not protect her. He was a pacifist. Finally, they were able to get themselves away from this aggressive man. We do not want Americans to be so passive that they will not protect their families and their country. ISIS, China, North Korea, Russia, and Iran will quickly enslave us. We who they let live. It's not realistic to be passive. The world is not a utopia and never will be because there are finite resources with infinite needs from humans.
Did you notice the lie in the Maine Boys To Men Program. It had stated that
the problem wasn't with boys but with the culture, but in reality they were "working" with boys not the culture. Working with the culture would be putting up signs, going on television, writing articles, that sort of thing. They didn't do that. Instead, they are working with boys using conversion therapy to get rid of their "toxic" masculinity. You lied! But why, one may ask. The answer is follow the money. There's third party funding - the school system- available for "treating" kids with conversion therapy so they won't be school shooters, but no
money to be had working with the "culture" whatever that is. Nick
Tuesday, June 5, 2018
School Shootings #9
Toxic masculinity appears to be boys and men trying to be dominant and being angry most of the time. First of all, it is your perfect right to try to dominate and be angry. The dominant male gets the pretty women. It's good evolution and thus it's part of the evolutionary drive for the individual to reproduce. If you choose to be angry or become angry as life seems to deal you one bad hand after another, that is your right. You have no obligation to have a particular mood. Telling little Johnny to be a brave little boy and not cry is now wrong. Boys shouldn't be encouraged to be stoic but should be just as sensitive as girls. This is in a world where ISIS skins people alive and puts living children into commercial mixing bowls and turn the bowls on. We absolutely must have Americans strong- stoic enough- to deal with these atrocities and not cry, at least for a while. Bury the dead respectfully, cry, and then go kill the murderers.
The Nazi-collectivists are using the term "toxic masculinity" to propagandize it into a cultural problem. Their solution to toxic masculinity is conversion therapy. You might remember it was used to try to convert homosexuals to heterosexuality and failed because we are individuals. Conversion therapy for people who have toxic masculinity is being touted as an answer to school shootings. This fits the basic principle of Nazi-collectivism: if the perfect program can just be found, all people subjected to it will become perfect. The reality is more in the direction that all people subjected to it will become dead as collectivism is the most killingest idea ever invented. Just as Lenin, Stalin, Mao, the Castro brothers, and Pol Pot. Also ask them how many beautiful girls they made their personal sex slaves too! I'm sure they weren't the least bit angry when they raped these girls either.
A recent article in the Wall Street Journal reported that two New York Times reporters have devised a program to detoxify masculinity. The program was the Maine Boys To Men program started in 1988 and now being used in public schools there. I called the Maine Governor's Office today, but the aide hadn't heard of it. But the program has a phone number, 207-774-9994., and a website.
The website says it "confronts narrow gender assumptions" and "we believe it is not the boys but rather the culture in which they live and grow that it in need of repair." But instead of addressing the culture and not the boys, they address the boys. I guess they would say they're addressing the culture in the boys. With their better culture, of course.
Their blog soothes us with the good news that "thousands" of their boys in middle school have shown shifts in attitudes toward "privilege."Studies by the University of New Hampshire substantiate these shifts.I hope those shifts are that blacks and women shouldn't have extra rights such as being "protected classes" and having affirmative action and set-asides to give them unfair advantages over whites. Somehow, I doubt those are the shifts, though the blog assures us that they are for "gender equality."
The blog takes to task the men around Harvey Weinstein who kept him safe as he preyed on women. I ask how about the women too like the millionaire actresses and female politicians like the woman who won the popular vote for president? Of course, she was too fear and trembling to say anything! That's presidential timber.
The take-away is that instead of keeping shooters outside schools by the use of metal detectors and gunpowder-sniffing Labradors, the Nazi-Collectivists first used school shootings as the excuse to try to snuff out gun ownership. Now it's expanded to trying to snuff out masculinity by conversion therapy which, like socialism, has been demonstrated not to work. But don't let that bother the Nazi-collectivists. Nick
The Nazi-collectivists are using the term "toxic masculinity" to propagandize it into a cultural problem. Their solution to toxic masculinity is conversion therapy. You might remember it was used to try to convert homosexuals to heterosexuality and failed because we are individuals. Conversion therapy for people who have toxic masculinity is being touted as an answer to school shootings. This fits the basic principle of Nazi-collectivism: if the perfect program can just be found, all people subjected to it will become perfect. The reality is more in the direction that all people subjected to it will become dead as collectivism is the most killingest idea ever invented. Just as Lenin, Stalin, Mao, the Castro brothers, and Pol Pot. Also ask them how many beautiful girls they made their personal sex slaves too! I'm sure they weren't the least bit angry when they raped these girls either.
A recent article in the Wall Street Journal reported that two New York Times reporters have devised a program to detoxify masculinity. The program was the Maine Boys To Men program started in 1988 and now being used in public schools there. I called the Maine Governor's Office today, but the aide hadn't heard of it. But the program has a phone number, 207-774-9994., and a website.
The website says it "confronts narrow gender assumptions" and "we believe it is not the boys but rather the culture in which they live and grow that it in need of repair." But instead of addressing the culture and not the boys, they address the boys. I guess they would say they're addressing the culture in the boys. With their better culture, of course.
Their blog soothes us with the good news that "thousands" of their boys in middle school have shown shifts in attitudes toward "privilege."Studies by the University of New Hampshire substantiate these shifts.I hope those shifts are that blacks and women shouldn't have extra rights such as being "protected classes" and having affirmative action and set-asides to give them unfair advantages over whites. Somehow, I doubt those are the shifts, though the blog assures us that they are for "gender equality."
The blog takes to task the men around Harvey Weinstein who kept him safe as he preyed on women. I ask how about the women too like the millionaire actresses and female politicians like the woman who won the popular vote for president? Of course, she was too fear and trembling to say anything! That's presidential timber.
The take-away is that instead of keeping shooters outside schools by the use of metal detectors and gunpowder-sniffing Labradors, the Nazi-Collectivists first used school shootings as the excuse to try to snuff out gun ownership. Now it's expanded to trying to snuff out masculinity by conversion therapy which, like socialism, has been demonstrated not to work. But don't let that bother the Nazi-collectivists. Nick
Monday, June 4, 2018
School Shootings #8
The denial of metal detectors and gunpowder-sniffing Labradors in schools just gets curiouser and curiouser. The Week magazine wrote about the Houston Chronicle urgently, seemingly, calling for measures "the whole nation knows will make a difference." It's reporters and columnists must be idiots because all they have to do is look at what the elites are doing to protect themselves if they can be induced to get off their lazy asses. Just go to a courthouse or a Social Security Office and you will encounter walk-through metal detectors and security guards with guns. That's what measures are making a difference, yet these newspaper idiots are gaming you as if the answer to school security is so difficult.
So why are the elites trying to con you and ignore putting up detectors and labs at the entrances to schools? My first hypothesis was that the collectivists think they have a vehicle - school shootings- that they can ride all the way to a ban on gun ownership by the individual. The collectivists are at war against the individual and disarming him would be a martial and psychological victory over him. My second hypothesis is that many collectivists do not want to spend the money necessary to install, maintain, and man detectors and gunpowder sniffing dogs for those who get their guns made with 3-D copiers plus providing a needed redundancy to detectors as all thing fail sometimes.
One huge group of collectivists who are also in the line of fire at schools are teachers. I suspect teachers if not consciously, then unconsciously, are thinking, "We can't be spending money on detectors and dogs! I want to get a big, fat raise!" It is hard to believe that teachers who are victims at school shootings are not demanding detectors and dogs instead of walking out of school for raises, but there are several reasons. First, teacher and social workers ( I'm one of the latter) score at the bottom in IQs in the professions. Secondly, people are pathetically timid and adaptable (again, I can attest to that, and I am only doing this assertive, determined effort here to keep the harpies of remorse from eating my alive at night in bed. I can't fool myself like the star of Manchester By The Sea who can only get release from his harpies by getting into fights with innocents at bars.) Teachers may be lions in the classrooms but frightened rabbits outside of them. Thirdly, teachers will be punished if they get outside of their union's box. There's a cost to everything. Teachers have long ago sacrificed being free and being a professional to the security, remuneration, and control of being union members. Fourth, schoolteachers are mainly collectivists. They go with the herd even with the slice of lemmings who go over the cliff.They're not going to be the nail that sticks out.
It is bizarre that teachers, who are killed in school shootings, would not be demanding metal detectors and gunpowder-sniffing dogs, but there are powerful reasons for doing that as I've listed. Plus, not so smart people are the most numerous users of the most primitive defense mechanism there is: denial as in
"Oh, it's not going to happen to me so I'll continue my boycott for higher wages instead of detectors and dogs." Dead schoolteachers don't get to spend their raises.
Nick
So why are the elites trying to con you and ignore putting up detectors and labs at the entrances to schools? My first hypothesis was that the collectivists think they have a vehicle - school shootings- that they can ride all the way to a ban on gun ownership by the individual. The collectivists are at war against the individual and disarming him would be a martial and psychological victory over him. My second hypothesis is that many collectivists do not want to spend the money necessary to install, maintain, and man detectors and gunpowder sniffing dogs for those who get their guns made with 3-D copiers plus providing a needed redundancy to detectors as all thing fail sometimes.
One huge group of collectivists who are also in the line of fire at schools are teachers. I suspect teachers if not consciously, then unconsciously, are thinking, "We can't be spending money on detectors and dogs! I want to get a big, fat raise!" It is hard to believe that teachers who are victims at school shootings are not demanding detectors and dogs instead of walking out of school for raises, but there are several reasons. First, teacher and social workers ( I'm one of the latter) score at the bottom in IQs in the professions. Secondly, people are pathetically timid and adaptable (again, I can attest to that, and I am only doing this assertive, determined effort here to keep the harpies of remorse from eating my alive at night in bed. I can't fool myself like the star of Manchester By The Sea who can only get release from his harpies by getting into fights with innocents at bars.) Teachers may be lions in the classrooms but frightened rabbits outside of them. Thirdly, teachers will be punished if they get outside of their union's box. There's a cost to everything. Teachers have long ago sacrificed being free and being a professional to the security, remuneration, and control of being union members. Fourth, schoolteachers are mainly collectivists. They go with the herd even with the slice of lemmings who go over the cliff.They're not going to be the nail that sticks out.
It is bizarre that teachers, who are killed in school shootings, would not be demanding metal detectors and gunpowder-sniffing dogs, but there are powerful reasons for doing that as I've listed. Plus, not so smart people are the most numerous users of the most primitive defense mechanism there is: denial as in
"Oh, it's not going to happen to me so I'll continue my boycott for higher wages instead of detectors and dogs." Dead schoolteachers don't get to spend their raises.
Nick
Friday, June 1, 2018
School Shootings #7
I have emailed Tomi Lahren of Fox News to get her take on why the politicians are even talking about metal detectors and gunpowder-sniffing dogs- preferably Labradors who are warm and fuzzy- at school entrances. I may not hear from her but at least she will know I support her and would take the drink thrown in her face at the restaurant by some Nazi- collectivist.
I was struck by the timidity of the Vermont state legislature's sergeant of arms this week when I asked him if he even heard of any talk about detectors and dogs by the state politicians gathered there. He wouldn't reply because his office was "bipartisan." Is protecting our children a partisan issue? Has rationality and the love of schoolchildren's lives now become decided on political grounds? If the Republicans supported detectors and dogs at schools, would Democrats and other collectivists be against them simply because Republicans were for them? In that case, can the Republicans pass a law mandating humans breathe, and then the collectivists would oppose the law and maybe even refuse to breathe as part of their stupid Resistance? One could only hope! Are we so ruled by our amygdala now that we're proud of our emotional immaturity and barbarity?
What happens to all these crazies? How do they hold jobs? Do they all get on disability because they're oh so sensitive? Who is going to have businesses so people can have jobs and be taxed so these snowflakes can get their disability checks -which is very dubious as paranoid schizophrenics are having problems?
Oh! The hateful Republicans will do that. It's great that the takers despise the makers. Otherwise, they would hate themselves, and they don't have the guts to do that. Nick
I was struck by the timidity of the Vermont state legislature's sergeant of arms this week when I asked him if he even heard of any talk about detectors and dogs by the state politicians gathered there. He wouldn't reply because his office was "bipartisan." Is protecting our children a partisan issue? Has rationality and the love of schoolchildren's lives now become decided on political grounds? If the Republicans supported detectors and dogs at schools, would Democrats and other collectivists be against them simply because Republicans were for them? In that case, can the Republicans pass a law mandating humans breathe, and then the collectivists would oppose the law and maybe even refuse to breathe as part of their stupid Resistance? One could only hope! Are we so ruled by our amygdala now that we're proud of our emotional immaturity and barbarity?
What happens to all these crazies? How do they hold jobs? Do they all get on disability because they're oh so sensitive? Who is going to have businesses so people can have jobs and be taxed so these snowflakes can get their disability checks -which is very dubious as paranoid schizophrenics are having problems?
Oh! The hateful Republicans will do that. It's great that the takers despise the makers. Otherwise, they would hate themselves, and they don't have the guts to do that. Nick
Thursday, May 31, 2018
School Shootings #6
I called New Hampshire Governor John Sunnunu's office today, and his aide had not heard any talk about putting metal detectors and gunpowder sniffing dogs at schools. To my asking, she replied that he was pro- Second Amendment. I asked the aide if she would find out why he's not demanding detectors and dogs.
I started to call the Vermont state representatives, but they did not have offices except for one Senator, and he had a robot.
I read in the Wall Street Journal today that the Texas governor has apparently never heard of metal detectors and dogs or has ruled them out because his new plans for schools don't include them. Instead he wants to come down harder on the citizen: He wants to require secure safety lockers for guns in your homes. fine you more if you don't have them, and require that the age of your kids be lengthened during which you as their parents are liable for their gun violence. You'd voted him into office? I plan to call and try to find out why he didn't push for detectors and dogs. I urge you to call as many legislators as you can and ask why no detectors and dogs. Be as forceful as you can. Make an impression. Blow their doors off. Remember, it could be your child, grandchild, niece, nephew next. Do it for the children! And when there's another school shooting, and you see the politicians and the security people wringing their hands and crying, spit on your screen. Nick
I started to call the Vermont state representatives, but they did not have offices except for one Senator, and he had a robot.
I read in the Wall Street Journal today that the Texas governor has apparently never heard of metal detectors and dogs or has ruled them out because his new plans for schools don't include them. Instead he wants to come down harder on the citizen: He wants to require secure safety lockers for guns in your homes. fine you more if you don't have them, and require that the age of your kids be lengthened during which you as their parents are liable for their gun violence. You'd voted him into office? I plan to call and try to find out why he didn't push for detectors and dogs. I urge you to call as many legislators as you can and ask why no detectors and dogs. Be as forceful as you can. Make an impression. Blow their doors off. Remember, it could be your child, grandchild, niece, nephew next. Do it for the children! And when there's another school shooting, and you see the politicians and the security people wringing their hands and crying, spit on your screen. Nick
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)